Tony Morris scapegoats gay people in bizarre child abuse denial rant

Tony Morris has indulged in a bizarre rant in which he denies any organizational problems with child abuse

Tony Morris has indulged in a bizarre rant in which he denies any organizational problems with child abuse

Governing Body member Tony Morris has used the July 2015 episode of JW Broadcasting to indulge in an astonishing rant about child abuse, seemingly in response to the onslaught of negative publicity Watchtower has faced in recent years.

In his nine-minute statement on the matter, Morris shows two video presentations and reads from a 1982 Awake! magazine in attempting to make the case that Watchtower has always been “pro-active” in making the protection of children a “top priority.”

At one point, Morris unleashes an astonishing swipe at gay people in an apparent attempt to scapegoat homosexuals as being the main perpetrators of child abuse. “It [an Awake! article] warned about homosexual men who prey on and advocate the right to use boys for sex. Shame on them!” he says. (See time stamp 02:49 in the video below.)

The 1982 “‘Chickens’ and ‘Hawks'” article to which Morris alludes is a shameless piece of propaganda blaming homosexuals in general for child prostitution rings that flourished in the 80s and 90s, and which society itself has condemned (such as in the 1994 award-winning documentary “Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys“). (See Wikipedia article)

Morris’ exploitation of this isolated controversy to make a sweeping generalization about gay people represents only the latest example of what appears to be a pattern of homophobic bigotry above and beyond even the scathing condemnation of gays and lesbians found in Watchtower publications.

Last year Morris was voted one of 2014’s craziest “right-wing nutjobs” by Advocate magazine for his baffling comments at last year’s United States Branch Visit, at which he warned of a conspiracy whereby homosexuals are designing tight clothing merely to lust after men’s bodies. (See time stamp 03:20 in the video below.)

And only recently, at the 2015 regional convention, Morris made a not-so-thinly-veiled declaration of his disapproval at Ireland’s recent referendum legalizing same-sex marriage.

Clearly Morris has an axe to grind against homosexuals for reasons best known to himself, but that he should mobilize his bigotry against gays in defense of the organization’s outrageous record on mishandling child abuse is bewildering to say the least.

Head in the sand

Homophobic scapegoating aside, Morris’ comments are a fascinating example of the organization’s “head in the sand” approach in the face of mounting media scrutiny of Watchtower’s child abuse track record.

This strategy was most recently deployed by Stephen Lett, who used a recorded “morning worship” speech to claim that media attention on the issue was nothing but “apostate-driven lies and dishonesties.”

As much as activists like myself desperately wish there to be no problem in this area, and as much as we yearn for JW children to be protected, various facts are well-documented and glaringly obvious, namely:

  • Watchtower has been found legally responsible for its mishandling of child abuse in courts of law on several occasions in two different countries (see articles on Candace Conti, Jose Lopez and the latest UK high court judgment), in some cases being ordered to pay multimillion dollar damages for their negligence
  • Watchtower gathers and holds information concerning an unknown number of pedophiles, thought to number into the thousands, on a database. Watchtower admitted the existence of the database in a 2002 fax to the BBC, and it lost the Jose Lopez case in part because it refused to divulge the contents of the database in that particular trial. (See this Huffington Post interview video.)
  • Watchtower publications do not urge parents to report allegations of child abuse to authorities in all instances
  • Watchtower elders have been criticized for covering up instances of child abuse from the authorities, as in the cases of Mark Sewell, Jonathan Rose and Gordon Leighton
  • Watchtower instructions to elders in the 2010 Shepherd the Flock of God book and subsequent instructional letters uphold the “two witness rule,” whereby if there is no witness to an allegation of child molestation (or no allegation from a second victim is forthcoming) elders are to “leave matters in Jehovah’s hands,” as the following scan clearly shows
  • Watchtower instructions to elders also maintain the position that the branch office, not the police, should be the first to hear of a report of abuse, and that past child molestation does not necessarily bar someone from serving as an elder in the congregation

child-sex-abuseNone of the above pressing issues are addressed or even alluded to in Morris’ nine-minute statement. Instead he heaps praise on the organization for taking “a decisive stand,” for being “pro-active,” and for making the safeguarding of children a “top priority.”

A reputation to be proud of?

Morris even summons the gall to claim: “We are proud of our reputation in this regard.” Irrespective of what Morris or other Governing Body members may think of their handling of child abuse, if there is one thing beyond dispute in this area, it is that Watchtower’s reputation is not one to be proud of.

One possible strategy Morris might have employed if he had an ounce of humility would be to throw his hands up and admit that, like other organizations, Watchtower was simply caught off guard at a time when the threat posed by child abuse wasn’t fully understood.

Instead, Morris adopts the reverse approach by suggesting the organization was always ahead of the game while secular authorities were floundering and “somewhat naive” as to the magnitude of the problem.

As an example of Watchtower’s foresight he parades the “landmark” 1982 Awake! magazine as highlighting the scourge of child abuse over thirty years ago. But it should go without saying that it is one thing to highlight child abuse as a problem, but another thing entirely to offer effective advice.

For example, the article in that magazine titled “To End Child Abuse” gives the following advice, few aspects of which can be considered especially relevant…

  • “[The bible] calls for close communication between parent and child”
  • “[Psychologists] say parents must be fair and set good examples, but children need regulations and discipline”
  • Sex education promotes masturbation and homosexuality. “Regardless of the pros and cons of sex education, the hard fact is the tremendous increase in child prostitution, sodomy, pornography and incest.”
  • “In God’s due time all who embrace his kingdom under Christ will become able to keep this law of love perfectly… This is the only way, the final way, to end child abuse.”

Watchtower’s 1982 guidance on protecting children from predators thus called for (1) better communication between parents and children, (2) strong parental discipline, (3) less sex education and (4) God’s kingdom. This advice, claims Morris, “straightforwardly addressed” the issue and, combined with subsequent magazine articles can be considered as exonerating Watchtower.

What Morris doesn’t mention is that not one of the magazine articles on child abuse published over the last few decades specifically tell Witness parents to go to the authorities with any and all allegations of abuse, which is surely the first priority in the wake of a crime of such magnitude being perpetrated. One 1993 Awake! article even goes so far as to suggest that, in certain cases, “the legal system may offer little hope of successful prosecution.” (Awake! 1993 10/8 page 9)

Morris attempts to throw up a smokescreen early in his presentation by asserting: “Our policy as an organization is that one professing to be a victim, or his parents, should never be discouraged from reporting the incident to the appropriate authorities.” But this is nothing more than a play on words, and a deliberate attempt to deceive.

It is one thing to tell children to resist predators, it is another thing entirely to deal properly with the aftermath

It is one thing to tell children to resist predators, it is another thing entirely to deal properly with the aftermath of an attack

True, Watchtower doesn’t expressly dissuade parents from going to the authorities, but it doesn’t persuade them either. Morris thus overtly relies on the ignorance of his audience regarding the nuances of Watchtower’s policies in an attempt to dupe them into thinking reporting is encouraged, even though the organization has yet to issue such instructions to elders despite repeated courtroom defeats.

At best, Watchtower literature over the decades has taught children to be able to identify predators and report such ones to their parents – the most recent example of which is the Caleb and Sophia cartoon presented by Morris in this video.

But teaching children to resist predators is only a fraction of any meaningful, effective child-safeguarding policy. The whole reason why child abuse is so evil is precisely because, for obvious reasons, children will always be vulnerable in the face of any sufficiently determined and opportunistic predatory pedophile, irrespective of how much resistance they put up.

Any child safeguarding policy worth its salt must thus adequately address what to do in the aftermath of an attack so that pedophiles are swiftly apprehended, and this is precisely where Watchtower falls woefully short. Parents are not told to go straight to the authorities by elders in every instance, they are merely informed that this is their “responsibility.”

Throw into the mix the perception that child abuse is a sin that the elders have a remit to investigate, the importance of “waiting on Jehovah,” the stigmatization of taking your “brother” to court, and fears surrounding slander and false accusations, and the likelihood of the police being left out of the loop entirely becomes all too apparent.

Worse than you think

I recently found myself in a phone conversation with a BBC journalist regarding Watchtower’s mishandling of child abuse. I expressed to her my frustration at the perception among Witnesses and Watchtower apologists that so-called “apostates” like myself are exaggerating the problem of child abuse.

I told her that, if anything my colleagues and I are understating the magnitude of the problem, because some of the horrendous stories we hear about privately simply cannot be publicized for various reasons.

She replied: “Welcome to the world of journalism.” This, apparently, is the challenge all journalists face in covering important stories where the full grisly horror of what is happening simply cannot be revealed for a myriad of issues including privacy, court orders and so on.

Tony Morris and the Governing Body may desperately want there to be no problem regarding child abuse, but as the saying goes, there is no smoke without fire. When you add up the relentless stream of child abuse reports in the press, including several clear instances where Watchtower has been found guilty and ordered to pay eye-watering sums in compensation, it is clear that, far from being ahead of the game, the organization is ablaze with this problem.

And documented evidence in the organization’s own instructions to elders leaves the Governing Body red-handed in not taking child abuse seriously enough by considering it a sin first, and a crime second.

For all his bluster, boasting and outrageous gay-bashing, the frustration and desperation of Tony Morris and his fellow Governing Body members is becoming painfully obvious.

Putting their hands over their ears and saying “la, la, la” in the face of serious accusations of child safeguarding negligence may work for them personally, but this juvenile charade only adds to their culpability as court after court finds Watchtower negligent. And growing numbers of Jehovah’s Witnesses are seeing straight through it.









Further reading…

A full video rebuttal of the JW Broadcasting episode in question is forthcoming, and will be embedded at the foot of this article when complete.

Bookmark the permalink.

74 Responses to Tony Morris scapegoats gay people in bizarre child abuse denial rant

  1. jon says:

    Hi Lloyd,

    Another well written piece. I would like to know what you, or others on this commenting board, think of the potential impact of the media coverage of the child abuse scandal on the rank and file. Do you think that the ongoing uncovering of child abuse scandals that are gaining momentum right now (e.g. BBC and Savile, Rotherham/Oxford grooming gangs, historical MP abuse network) will dilute the coverage of the JW child abuse scandal? Or do you think this will amplify the awareness of the general public and the rank and file?

    All the best,

    • pj wilcox says:

      Sir it amplify the sound so you can hear it all over NYC.
      Just look at the media coverage on the Royal Commission in Aussie land?
      Kind of says it all, would you not agree?

  2. Cherie says:

    Lloyd, I am so glad you are Tony’s “No. 1 troll.” Stay on him. There is no way this organization has divine direction with a raving lunatic homophobe like this as a leader.

  3. will says:

    The “faithful & discreet slave” are just awful, ignorant people. If you believe in the scriptures (and I don’t anymore), then the slave has become wicked.

  4. Darnell says:

    I was creeped out by the recent Caleb and Sophia video. More creepy was that when I saw it I wondered… “Is there something about to hit the news?” (There is always something so I quickly dismissed it.)

    Then I heard a lady call in to talk to a cadidate for FL State Attorney. The lady went on a bit of a rant but somehow mentioned off the cuff how JW had hid documents about child abuse.

    One quick google search:

    Creepy… Muahha…

    • searching says:

      Darnell, do you have a link to that specific Sophia and Caleb video you’re referring to? I’d like to show it to jw friends and ask questions.

  5. Tim Smith says:

    Hi Lloyd. What do you make of the short commercial that the WT made? I was raised a JW and have never heard of them doing anything like that in the past. Making a Public Service Announcement to be shown on TV? It seemed to be done to satisfy a secular requirement, sort of like how the UN required them to put something in print once a year. I just find it strange that something would be done in such a clandestine way and then 25 years later brought, dusted off, and shown to everyone as if it were some sort of trophy. If this PSA was such a great thing why is this the first we are hearing of it?

  6. pj wilcox says:

    These morons should be considered enemy combatants for they, alone are destroying lives and families. Yet they come in sheeps clothing but attack like a pack of wolves that leave no tracks to hunt and kill. Well boys its all over now.
    Your outed, I dare you to go door to door……………..

  7. Peter Jeuck says:

    Time and time again we have seen the hypocrisy of a high profile preacher or conservative politician when,after years of high profile bashing of gays as immoral, are silenced when they are caught in a motel having homosexual sex. This type of thing has happened time and time again over many years. Those who rail the loudest against what they maintain as being immoral, are quite probably guilty of the thing they are condemning. I wouldn’t mat all be surprised if Tony isn’t having a little covert male with male hoochy coochy in some secluded motel or hotel there in NYC! After all in his public addresses, and comportment he doesn’t exactly come off like John Wayne now does he PilgrIm? The sad thing is if he is ever caught with his tight pants to his knees he won’t so much as to say he’s sorry in even the least way. He’s truly a despicable, deplorable, truly horrible, sadistic horrible, horrible, horrible human beings that has walked the face of the Earth, and it’s very sad to say that he has authority over people’s lives. I don’t find the man comical one bit, because he’s serious about being a danger to a segment of society so long oppressed. If we were visited by an alien civilization some day, I’d be embarrassed for humanity that at such a man would represent a not so insisignificant portion of humanity as a moral and religious leader.

  8. Negib says:

    Hello, I’me an elder from France who will soon escape from the WTS because of it’s hypocrisy! The vidéo that has been criticized was the trigger of my décision to leave this organisation. I’me not really fluent in english but I saw here that the most big argument seem to be the “homophobic” attitude of the WTS. It’s the case but for me, the worst problème in this vidéo is the great manipulation of the JW org faithful members… When I saw it, I’ve seen before the related trial of the royale court. When I heard Tonny morris, I felt anger and disgust. I wrote a letter that I will send soon to the french branch and to my long e-mail list of friends who are almost JW and to the WTS in América, just to be relieved! I cannot imagine such a stupid behavior from a church! I’me thinking that in this situation, the WTS should have to be honnest because when that information will spread, the WTS will be more destabilized. I dont understand such a stupid strategy.

    Best regards from Negib.

  9. Timmond says:

    I was in Australia during their commission into child abuse. It was fairly obvious that Anthony Morris lied. He was caught in his lies too which was good. One thing I remember was him stating that JW have never encouraged physical punishment of kids and the rod of discipline was just a symbol and didn’t mean a literal rod. That is complete and utter hogwash!

    But the prosecutor was 3 steps ahead of him. When Morris said it was a symbolic rod (because he didn’t want to get in trouble for promoting child abuse) the prosecutor got him to say that Bible commands need to be adapted to our modern day.

    Boom. That was tied into -ok then why not adapt the 2 witness rule to child abuse cases? Even still the 2 witness rule could be used for congregation matters but the police can still be called. In mind mind child abuse is worse than murder. If a murder was committed by a JW would they still call the branch office first and not even bother to call the police? The truth is it is witness policy to NOT call the police. It is also witness policy to spank children.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Comment posting guidelines:

Kindly observe the following requirements before posting any comments to our articles or pages:

  • ABUSIVE COMMENTS - Do not post comments that include swear words or may be considered abusive, lewd, blasphemous, obscene or threatening
  • ILLEGAL COMMENTS - Do not post comments that condone or propose illegal activity, or that breach copyright law
  • OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS - Do not post comments that are off-topic and bear no relation to the page or article
  • RELIGIOUS NEUTRALITY - Do not post comments that are evangelical in nature or may be construed as imposing one person's religious beliefs (or lack thereof) over those of another
  • LANGUAGE - Visitors from all countries and language groups are welcome. You may post comments in languages other than English, but we would appreciate if you could make any such comments brief. We would also be grateful if you could run any such comments through Google Translate and convert these to English, but this is not an absolute requirement.
  • LINKS - You may post links to third party websites, so long as (1) you limit these to 2 links per comment, and (2) the content on these links doesn't contravene ANY of the first four points. Specifically, you may not post URLs to websites that are evangelical in nature. Our links page has an extensive list of such sites for any who are curious about Christian beliefs in the context of Jehovah's Witnesses. thanks all visitors in advance for respectfully observing these guidelines. Any who persistently fail to do so, despite warnings, may find themselves blocked from making further comments at the discretion of the site moderators, whose decision will be final and not open for debate.